The agent reads source, not training-data folklore.
When a decision touches a convention someone else already worked out, the answer comes from the pinned repo — not from whatever the model half-remembers.
ch · studies
Pinned reading,
not paraphrase.
Each study scopes one domain question and pins upstream code as nested git submodules. We read from the pinned source — not from training data, not from a paraphrase, not from a blog post that aged out a year ago.
study · 01
Open Specs & Standards
study · 02
Memory Layers for Agents
study · 03
Data-Analytics Specs & Standards
ch · why pin
Why pin upstream code instead of bookmarking it?
SHA-pinned. Doesn't rot under us.
A study's submodule points at a specific commit. When we revisit a study six months later, the same source is still there. Upgrades are explicit, not silent.
One study, one question.
Studies are not a general reading list. Each one scopes a single domain question and pins only what helps answer it. New questions get new studies, not pile-ons.